pbstudio
e-Book American Civil-Military Relations: The Soldier and the State in a New Era download

e-Book American Civil-Military Relations: The Soldier and the State in a New Era download

by Suzanne C. Nielsen,Don M. Snider

ISBN: 0801892880
ISBN13: 978-0801892882
Language: English
Publisher: Johns Hopkins University Press; 1 edition (October 5, 2009)
Pages: 432
Category: Humanities
Subategory: Other

ePub size: 1170 kb
Fb2 size: 1861 kb
DJVU size: 1613 kb
Rating: 4.5
Votes: 716
Other Formats: doc mobi rtf lrf

American Civil-Military Relations is a valid and vital updating of Huntington's work and should be on every military reading list today.

American Civil-Military Relations is a valid and vital updating of Huntington's work and should be on every military reading list today. Colonel (Re. Robert Killebrew Parameters). Suzanne Nielsen and Don Snider's volume, American Civil-Military Relations: The Soldier and the State in a New Era is one such work and a valuable addition to the literature on civil-military relations, a vitally important issue for both scholars and practitioners. Getting the balance right between civilian authority and military competence is vital to the republic in war and peace.

Suzanne C. Nielsen, Don M. Snider. American Civil-Military Relations offers the first comprehensive assessment of the subject since the publication of Samuel P. Huntington's field-defining book, The Soldier and the State. Using this seminal work as a point of departure, experts in the fields of political science, history, and sociology ask what has been learned and what more needs to be investigated in the relationship between civilian and military sectors in the 21st century.

Our Army: Soldiers, Politics, and American Civil-Military Relations. Such works are too often uneven and not worth the time or tedium to read.

Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press, 2009. 118+ million publications.

American Civil Liberties Union - n. A national organization dedicated to protecting constitutionally guaranteed civil rights and liberties. ACLU The Essential Law Dictionary. Sphinx Publishing, An imprint of Sourcebooks, Inc. Amy Hackney Blackwell. American Civi. Law dictionary. American Civil Liberties Union v. Ashcroft (2004) - American Civil Liberties Union v. Ashcroft (filed April 9, 2004 in the United States) is a lawsuit filed on behalf of an unknown party by the American Civil Liberties Union against the .

American Civil-Military Relations offers the first comprehensive . Lieutenant Colonel Suzanne C Nielsen; Dr Don M Snider.

American Civil-Military Relations offers the first comprehensive assessment of the subject since the publication of Samuel P. American Civil-Military Relations is essential reading for students and scholars interested in civil-military relations, . politics, and national security policy. Johns Hopkins University Press.

American Civil-Military Relations: The Soldier and the State in a New Er.

American Civil-Military Relations: The Soldier and the State in a New Era. Johns Hopkins Press, 2009. In addition, there are article length readings assigned. Background Reading Chris Gibson and Don Snider, Civil-Military Relations and the Potential to Influence: A Look at National Security Decision-Making Process, Armed forces & Society, 25,2 (Winter 1999): 193-218; Martin Edmonds. Central Organizations of Defense. Westview, 1985; Michael J. Hogan; Hans Born, Philipp Flury, and A. Johnson, eds. Parliamentary Oversight of the Security Sector. Geneva: Centre for the Democratic Control of the Armed Forces; Andrew Cottey, et al.

American Civil-Military Relations The first section of the book provides contrasting perspectives of American civil-military relations within the last five decades.

American Civil-Military Relations. The first section of the book provides contrasting perspectives of American civil-military relations within the last five decades. The next section addresses Huntington's conception of societal and functional imperatives and their influence on the civil-military relationship.

Send report: This is a good book. Lewis & Clark College.

American Civil-Military Relations offers the first comprehensive assessment of the subject since the publication of Samuel P. Huntington's field-defining book, The Soldier and the State. Using this seminal work as a point of departure, experts in the fields of political science, history, and sociology ask what has been learned and what more needs to be investigated in the relationship between civilian and military sectors in the 21st century.

Leading scholars―such as Richard Betts, Risa Brooks, James Burk, Michael Desch, Peter Feaver, Richard Kohn, Williamson Murray, and David Segal―discuss key issues, including:• changes in officer education since the end of the Cold War;• shifting conceptions of military expertise in response to evolving operational and strategic requirements;• increased military involvement in high-level politics; and• the domestic and international contexts of U.S. civil-military relations.

The first section of the book provides contrasting perspectives of American civil-military relations within the last five decades. The next section addresses Huntington's conception of societal and functional imperatives and their influence on the civil-military relationship. Following sections examine relationships between military and civilian leaders and describe the norms and practices that should guide those interactions. The editors frame these original essays with introductory and concluding chapters that synthesize the key arguments of the book.

What is clear from the essays in this volume is that the line between civil and military expertise and responsibility is not that sharply drawn, and perhaps given the increasing complexity of international security issues, it should not be. When forming national security policy, the editors conclude, civilian and military leaders need to maintain a respectful and engaged dialogue.

American Civil-Military Relations is essential reading for students and scholars interested in civil-military relations, U.S. politics, and national security policy.

Comments:
Zonama
An important contribution to the topic. In my opinion the various chapters are capable in being ranked in significance although all of a very high quality. This ranking entirely subjective but given passage of time the continued contribution of some chapters makes this ranking a necessity.

Thus, the following from most important contribution even now as opposed to lesser long-term significance.

1. Professionalism and Professional Military Education [chapter 7];

2.Militaries and Political Activities in Democracies [chapter 11];

3. Enhancing National Security and Civilian Control of the Military: A Madisonian Approach [chapter 12];

4. Building Trust: Civil-Military Behaviors for Effective National Security [chapter 13];

5. Hartz, Huntington, and the Liberal Tradition in America: The Clash with Military Realism [chapter 5];

6. Responsible Obedience by Military Professionals: The Discretion to Do What is Wrong [chapter 8];

7. Winning Wars, Not Just Battles: Expanding the Military Profession to Incorporate Stability Operations [chapter 6];

8. Are Civil-Military Relations Still a Problem? [chapter 2];

9. A Broken Dialogue: Rumsfeld, Shinseki, and Civil-Military Tension [chapter 3];

10. Before and After Huntington: The Methodological Maturing of Civil-Military Studies [chapter 4];

11. The Military Mind: A Reassessment of the Ideological Roots of American Military Professionalism [chapter 9];

12. Conclusions [chapter 14;

13. Changing Conceptions of the Military as a Profession [chapter 10].

Obviously my ranking is subjective. Given what is known and unknown about the civil-military interface in the civilian leadership of the Nation it is very clear that discussion of what I call FIRST PRINCIPLES OF THE CIVIL-MILITARY INTERFACE is woefully absent for the civil side of the interface. Perhaps defectively the military side of the relationship has put forth more effort to try and understand this very very complex subject. This book documents to some degree that effort but wide gaps exist in understanding the civilian side of the equation and how Congress impacts that relationship.

Tojahn
On time, as described.

Peles
Edited volumes are often uneven and not worth the price of admission. The best of them, however, are worth their weight in gold. To get to this stage, the book has to be organized along a clear theme; it has to be original work; it has to be well designed; and it has to be tightly edited.

Suzanne Nielsen and Don Snider's volume, American Civil-Military Relations: The Soldier and the State in a New Era is one such work and a valuable addition to the literature on civil-military relations, a vitally important issue for both scholars and practitioners. Getting the balance right between civilian authority and military competence is vital to the republic in war and peace.

The book came from original contributions from experts who attended the West Point Senior Conference in 2007, which was devoted to a festschrift on the 50th anniversary of the publication of Samuel Huntington's epic, The Soldier and the State. The book is best remembered for suggesting that the optimum division of labor is for civilians to make policy, but for the military to give advice, avoid politics, and be accorded professional space in the conduct of tactical and operational affairs. After a few days discussion and subsequent editing, the contributors to this volume --- including Columbia's Dick Betts, UNC's Dick Kohn, Duke's Peter Feaver --- had covered the waterfront, not only critiquing Huntington's basic theory but bringing the analysis forward 50 years to the present day. New material was presented by Colonel Matt Moten on the affair Shinseki, the famous case where a serving Chief of Staff of the Army was "dissed" by senior civilians for giving his honest opinion to Senate questioners. Nadia Schadlow and Colonel Rich Lacquement discussed how the profession of arms has to broaden its view and include stability operations skills in its concept of professional competence. Historian Williamson Murray made important recommendations for professional military education, and Dick Kohn suggested commonsense (but generally conservative) rules for active and retired officers to build trust with their civilian superiors and vice versa.

In the end, no plan survives contact with the enemy and no classic work from 1957 could endure for fifty years without serious corrections and amendments. In their excellent conclusion, Don Snider and LTC Suzanne Nielsen of West Point's Department of Social Sciences summarize nearly a dozen conclusions on the classic. In their words, "the most significant shortcoming of Huntington's construct was its failure to recognize that a separation between political and military affairs is not possible --- particularly at the highest levels of policymaking." And therein lies the rub, as well as the importance of this new book. It should be required reading for all war college students and all senior civilian officials of the Department of Defense should receive a copy of it on the day when they are nominated.

Joseph J. Collins teaches strategy at the National War College. He served for 28 years as an Army officer and later served as a civilian Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense.

ISBN: 041542884X
ISBN13: 978-1403991553
language: English
Subcategory: Humanities
ISBN: 1561901113
ISBN13: 978-1561901111
language: English
Subcategory: Americas
ISBN: 1423536770
ISBN13: 978-1423536772
language: English
ISBN: 0691115842
ISBN13: 978-0691115849
language: English
Subcategory: Social Sciences
ISBN: 1555873006
ISBN13: 978-1555873004
language: English
Subcategory: Social Sciences
ISBN: 0713712635
ISBN13: 978-0713712636
language: English
ISBN: 0754675912
ISBN13: 978-0754675914
language: English
Subcategory: Social Sciences
ISBN: 190762502X
ISBN13: 978-1907625022
language: English
Subcategory: Humanities
ISBN: 0714651893
ISBN13: 978-0714651897
language: English
Subcategory: Humanities
ISBN: 0415358515
ISBN13: 978-0415358514
language: English
Subcategory: Humanities