e-Book Accepting Authoritarianism: State-Society Relations in China's Reform Era download

e-Book Accepting Authoritarianism: State-Society Relations in China's Reform Era download

by Teresa Wright

ISBN: 0804769036
ISBN13: 978-0804769037
Language: English
Publisher: Stanford University Press; 1 edition (March 8, 2010)
Pages: 263
Category: Social Sciences
Subategory: Other

ePub size: 1178 kb
Fb2 size: 1425 kb
DJVU size: 1892 kb
Rating: 4.5
Votes: 570
Other Formats: lrf doc mobi azw

State-society relations in post-mao chinese economic reforms: changes and challenges. This study examines the impact of China's post-Mao economic reforms on its state-society relation.

State-society relations in post-mao chinese economic reforms: changes and challenges. The study first provides an overview of China's state-society relations before the post-Mao reforms. It then offers some detailed analyses regarding changes in state-society relations that stem from the economic reforms

Teresa Wright is Professor of Political Science at California State University, Long Beach.

Teresa Wright is Professor of Political Science at California State University, Long Beach. She is also the author of The Perils of Protest: State Repression and Student Activism in China.

Teresa Wright contends that all China’s diverse economic strata succeed by relying on the state. 9Party power-holders in China have often declared that corruption could undermine their government. Wright’s excellent work documents that cruel corruption. Therefore, they are not about to turn against their government. Wright, Teresa, Accepting Authoritarianism: State-society Relations in China’s Reform Era. Edward Friedman.

Accepting Authoritarianism book. Goodreads helps you keep track of books you want to read. Start by marking Accepting Authoritarianism: State-Society Relations in China's Reform Era as Want to Read: Want to Read savin. ant to Read. Библиографические данные. Accepting Authoritarianism: State-Society Relations in China's Reform Era. Автор. Издание: иллюстрированное.

Allies of the State: China’s Private: Entre-preneurs and Democratic Change Jie Chen and Bruce Dickson Harvard University Press. Electoral College Reform: Challenges and Possibilities Gary E. Bugh Ashgate Publishing. Courts and Power in Latin America and Africa Siri Gloppen, Bruce M. Wilson, Rober-to Gargarella, Elin Skaar, and Morten Kinander Palgrave Macmillan. Debating Moral Education: Rethinking the Role of the Modern University Elizabeth Kiss and J. Peter Euben, eds. Duke University Press. Eternal Colonialism Russell Benjamin and Gregory O. Hall University Press of America. Experiencing the State Lloyd I. Rudolph and John Kurt Jacobsen, eds. Therefore, they are not about to turn against their government

Teresa Wright contends that all China’s diverse economic strata succeed by relying on the state. Wright’s choice of strata leads to a vision of China as half an onion, with only a few at the top and most people at the bottom, mainly workers and farmers

book by Teresa Wright

book by Teresa Wright.

In lieu of an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content: A number of the most insightful and important books in the social sciences have been based. For questions or feedback, please reach us at support at scilit.

Why hasn't the emergence of capitalism led China's citizenry to press for liberal democratic change? This book argues that China's combination of state-led development, late industrialization, and socialist legacies have affected popular perceptions of socioeconomic mobility, economic dependence on the state, and political options, giving citizens incentives to perpetuate the political status quo and disincentives to embrace liberal democratic change. Wright addresses the ways in which China's political and economic development shares broader features of state-led late industrialization and post-socialist transformation with countries as diverse as Mexico, India, Tunisia, Indonesia, South Korea, Brazil, Russia, and Vietnam.With its detailed analysis of China's major socioeconomic groups (private entrepreneurs, state sector workers, private sector workers, professionals and students, and farmers), Accepting Authoritarianism is an up-to-date, comprehensive, and coherent text on the evolution of state-society relations in reform-era China.
Many expected or at least hoped that democracy would follow the opening of China's economy thirty-one years ago. It hasn't - even with China's socialist history and its now highest level of economic inequality in the world. Professor Teresa Wright, Chairman of California State University at Long Beach's Department of Political Science explains why in her excellent book, "Accepting Authoritarianism." According to her in-depth analysis, each major sector of China accepts and supports the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and there is no imminent 'anti-government volcano.' Wright also contends that that the reasons for this are that most Chinese believe their authoritarian government has brought about the country's and their own economic rise and will continue to do so, many depend on the state for benefits or security, and any others have neither a way or reason to link their mostly local protests.

Some of the most obvious 'pacifiers, per Wright:' Private enterprise owners and SOE (state-owned enterprise) workers and managers have privileged relationships with and benefits from the CCP, giving them an interest in preserving the status quo. The state also has control of key economic resources (eg. land, rare earths, state bank loans), as well as issuance of permits, approvals, and contracts. Professionals similarly benefit from positive associations with the state. Thirdly, reforms since 1987 have reduced the appeal of political alternatives - rural residents are now able to elect local leaders, and citizens have a growing ability to voice grievances through petitions and the courts. (Example - protests over potential radiation exposure from extending Shanghai's maglev train brought about its cancellation.) These new powers also help the CCP rein in government corruption and the rapacious elite. Fourth, farmers no longer are dependent on the state in growing and selling crops, college graduates are no longer assigned jobs by the state, and the state is no longer involved in marriage and other personal decisions (except for the one-child policy). Wright adds that older citizens are the most supportive of political stability - they remember the terror and violence associated with the Cultural Revolution while the very oldest also remember the chaos associated with China's 1958-61 'Great Famine' and its preceding Civil War.

Businesspeople formerly were formerly scorned, even tortured and killed. Since 2002, however, they have been invited to join the CCP, and business leaders are now its most heavily represented (34%) component, vs. about 5% nationally. Promoting economic growth has also become key to evaluating local officials, and the government provides major support for high-technology development. The proportion of college students within the CCP has also risen, and the top students are actively recruited - the benefit to them is help getting government jobs and education funding. Laid-off former SOE workers are eligible for government-provided 'basic living expenses,' though only about half actually receive anything, and the amount is inadequate. Much more importantly, most current and former SOE workers receive government-subsidized housing, as well as many others with low incomes.

China's unions are CCP-controlled and been prevented from becoming a disrupting force in the interest of encouraging greater foreign investment. This last year, however, brought their strengthening in the face of labor shortages and the raft of suicides at FoxConn. Wages were increased at FoxConn and Honda, and Wal-Mart in China became unionized. On the other hand, the China Democracy Party (CDP) and the China Labor Bulletin (CLB), formed just prior to President Clinton's 1998 visit, have been stifled and their leaders subjected to long jail terms - a lesson to any group or union thinking of stretching existing 'freedoms.' (Liu Xiaobo's continued imprisonment, despite winning the 2010 Nobel Peace Prize, reinforces the point.)

Farmers and migrant workers represent both the largest (740 million) and the bottom-tier of China's economic strata. Farmers with additional income sources (eg. other employment, shop ownership) are best off; those without have far less income than city-workers, per Wright. Regardless, farmers' situation recently improved through becoming exempt from taxes, and know their situation is now far better than under Mao. China still maintains the 'hukou' system of family registration dating back at least 2,000 years that limited rural residents from migrating to (and overwhelming) urban centers. These limitations, however, generally are no longer enforced and may soon be eliminated. While migrants that move into major cities have very poor living conditions and few rights, their situation has also recently been improved by the government's requirement that employers provide them written contracts, and a vibrant construction (infrastructure, commercial, and residential) boom; regardless, their guaranteed rural land rights provides both them and those remaining on the farm with a sense of long-term security. Resentment over unemployment is tempered by state propaganda that employment is the workers' responsibility, thus for the most part avoiding potential CCP liability. (The state did undertake a major stimulus effort in response to 2008's sagging demand for Chinese imports.) Only about 3% of farmers and almost no migrant workers are CCP members, compared to about 9% of urban adults.

Disturbances, however, are not uncommon in China. Author Wright reports 10,000 'disturbances' in 1996, per official government statistics, rising to 87,000 in 2005 with 4 million participants. Major grievances have included SOE layoffs, inadequate pensions, unpaid wages from private employers, excessive taxes, and numerous unfair land takings by local government officials (usually for new businesses). However, Wright emphasizes that these disturbances do not reflect widespread dissatisfaction with the central regime, and their political goals usually are limited to urging local officials to live up to the socialist ideals of the central government (CCP). Scores of public opinion surveys find very high popular support for the central government; for example, PEW Global Global Attitudes surveys in 2009 and 2010 found Chinese citizens' satisfaction with 'national conditions' and the economy far higher in China than other nations - including the U.S. New state priorities including further improving citizen satisfaction through greater job opportunities for those in central and west China, returning to mostly government-supplied health care and education (aka the Mao era), and implementing/funding a national pension system - all within a background of reducing income inequality.

Wright does not address possible CCP opposition from the military. Mitigating its potential opposition, however, is its inclusion within the CCP, though not as strongly at the top as before. China's initial post-Mao reformer Deng Xiaoping was probably more able to control the military than most, given the respect for his earlier leadership of anti-Japanese forces prior to the CCP takeover; Deng early on counseled the military to wait on most of its demands until the economy strengthened. The military has since also greatly benefited under CCP leadership through modernization, and implementation of asymmetric warfare capabilities (numerous silent submarines, anti-ship missiles, and ICBMs), new carrier and stealth-fighter building programs, and the government's continued hard-line stance vs. Taiwan, Japan, and the U.S. Finally, the CCP has managed to benefit from Chinese nationalistic sentiment through obtaining world-wide admiration of its impressive Olympic and World's Fair performances, taking the world's 'supercomputer crown,' education-building/achievements, and numerous other 'soft-power' enhancements (eg. foreign building projects, loans, and purchases).

Wright believes that those contending democracy is inexorably linked with economic development do so by inappropriately drawing parallels with workers' pressure for political power at the time of the Industrial Revolution. At that time workers wanted protection from both the state and employers, while limitations on capital mobility gave labor much greater leverage than today because capitalists had very limited choices in locating production. China, on the other hand, has already provided a number of benefits to its workers; moreover, in today's globalization Wright sees workers and capitalists needing government assistance in obtaining jobs, as well as protection from other nations via tariffs and preferential procurement. Thus, today's external economic pressures support government, unlike at the time of the Industrial Revolution.

One more topic unaddressed by Wright - China's leaders studied events in the dissolving former Soviet Union and its satellites, concluding that part of the reason government lost control was that it had expanded political freedoms. This has reinforced CCP adherence to continued monopoly of power.

Bottom-Line: Wright's thoughtful and well-documented material provides a compelling explanation of why democracy has not followed economic development in China. Others contend China's rapid and steady progress would not even have been possible in a democratic society with all the associated delays in decision-making and implementation - India's much slower development and U.S. political stalemates and economic stagnation, compared to similar rapid economic development in more authoritarian post-WWII Japan, Singapore, South Korea, and Taiwan serve as examples. Wright, however, does concede that China's stability is vulnerable if the CCP fails to continue to deliver progress in the future. Instead of democracy in China, we should expect continued acceptance of CCP authoritarianism, and more rapid economic growth.

This is a must-read for anyone who wants to better understand how China has remained politically stable under the leadership of the Chinese Communist Party in spite of the dramatic changes in economy and society over the past 20 years. Wright does something that few scholars in political science are likely to do: parse "society" into discrete groups, and then assess the range of interests and values that prompt these groups to generally opt for the political status quo in terms of the structure of state-society relations. For students of China, Wright provides a very compelling answer to date for why the Huntington's famous "gap hypothesis" has not been borne out in the case of China, where there is relatively low clamoring for system change in spite of growing inequality and sudden shifts in economic fortune for various strata in society For students of Russia and East-Central Europe, who have been surprised that post-communist transitions did not bring greater protest and increased civil-society mobilization, this book may have important insights and intuitions. I highly recommend this book for anyone interested in social-scientific analyses of contemporary China, of post-communist transitions, of democratization and of comparative political economy writ large.

I really enjoyed this book by Teresa Wright. Se is very knowledged about Chinese history and politics and she explains the issues in a way that is easy for a reader to comprehend. The book covers the most important topics of political and cultural relations in China and is a good read as a text book or for someone with personal interest towards global issues.

This book attempts to tell why China's citizenry still accepts the current regime and does not press for liberal democratic change. It does not utilize original interview or survey data. Nor does it include systematic measures of support for the current regime. So, it looks like more a trade book than a serious academic monograph. It's quite disappointing.

If I wanted to read about why living in a dictatorship is so good I would have supported the left regulating the media. Avoid.

THis book illuminates fundamental trends in Chinese society. It is required reading for anyone seeking to grasp Chinese politics in any depth.

ISBN: 0817994211
ISBN13: 978-0817994211
language: English
Subcategory: Humanities
ISBN: 9004187162
ISBN13: 978-9004187160
language: English
Subcategory: Social Sciences
ISBN: 0312233620
ISBN13: 978-0312233624
language: English
Subcategory: Humanities
ISBN: 0582684439
ISBN13: 978-0582684430
language: English
Subcategory: Economics
ISBN: 0275965538
ISBN13: 978-0275965532
language: English
Subcategory: Humanities
ISBN: 0520080513
ISBN13: 978-0520080515
language: English
Subcategory: Economics
ISBN: 0415460336
ISBN13: 978-0415460330
language: English
Subcategory: Humanities
ISBN: 0873324269
ISBN13: 978-0873324267
language: English
Subcategory: Social Sciences
ISBN: 9814291463
ISBN13: 978-9814291460
language: English
Subcategory: Economics
ISBN: 1563240920
ISBN13: 978-1563240928
language: English
Subcategory: Social Sciences